Legal Opinion

Jun v. Myers

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 2001No. Nos. B132502, B138750PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*119Opinion

TODD, J.

William Jun purchased inventory and furniture from Michael Myers, a receiver1 in a civil action to which Jun was not a party. Several months after the purchase, Jun claimed to have discovered the assets he purchased were not as represented. He filed a motion seeking leave to sue receiver either in that action or in a separate lawsuit. The motion was denied. Jun made a subsequent motion to intervene in that action, which motion was also denied. This appeal is a consolidation of Jun’s separate appeals from the denial of his motions to sue and to intervene.

Jun contends that: (1)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Noya v. A.W. Coulter TruckingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Gold v. Gold Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Roos v. Honeywell International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2009
  5. Marriage of Hogan CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API