Legal Opinion

Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1994No. S034603PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

This lawsuit challenges an advertising campaign for Camel cigarettes featuring a cartoon character called Old Joe Camel. The campaign, it is claimed, improperly targets minors, and seeks to make cigarette smokers of them. The issue before us is whether the action is preempted by federal law. Its resolution requires us to interpret and apply the recent decision of Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. (1992) 505 U.S. _ [120 L.Ed.2d 407, 112 S.Ct. 2608], which itself interpreted the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (15 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq.).

We conclude that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API