Legal Opinion

Gold v. Gold Realty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2003No. B169072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Richard E. Gold, Emily Gold Mears, and Jean Gold Friedman, appeal from a July 28, 2003, order appointing a limited purpose receiver to market and sell real property which was the subject of a September 26, 1996, judgment entered by now retired Judge Richard G. Harris. We affirm the July 28, 2003, order because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in appointing a limited purpose receiver to enforce the terms of the September 26, 1996, judgment ordering the marketing and the sale of the property.

II. BACKGROUND

The parties in this action are…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Palo Alto-Menlo Park Yellow Cab Co. v. Santa Clara County Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Lesser & Son v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Barnes v. ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Biasi v. Nielson CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. City of Desert Hot Springs v. ValentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Dissolution and Winding Up of Ocean View EstatesSuperior Court of Guam · 2023
  5. Medipro Medical Staffing v. Certified Nursing RegistryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API