Legal Opinion
Roos v. Honeywell International, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 2015No. A142156PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUMES, P. J.
Four objectors — Art Rogers, Chuck Congdon, Richard Moser, and Amanda Waldenville — appeal from the trial court’s order approving an $8.15 million settlement of a class action against Honeywell International, Inc., and awarding a portion of the settlement as fees to class counsel. The trial court found that the objectors failed to establish they had standing, but it then rejected Rogers’s objection on timeliness grounds and rejected the other three objectors’ objections on their merits. Except for the ruling on standing, we affirm. In doing so, we reject the objectors’…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hernandez v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Hargrove v. Legacy Healthcare, IncCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Kim v. PCP-Sundance CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- R Consulting & Sales v. Kim CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021