Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Cross

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1907No. Civ. No. 203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appeal from judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff, Patrick F. Dillon, brought this action against Patrick Dillon, the father of plaintiff, for an accounting of moneys claimed to have been delivered to said defendant by plaintiff in trust to be held and invested for plaintiff, and for general relief. The cause was tried, and judgment rendered for plaintiff during the lifetime of defendant, who subsequently dying, the executor of his last will was substituted as party defendant. By the term ‘ ‘ defendant, ’ ’ when used in this opinion, we refer to the original…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Penrose v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Taber v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Reay v. ReayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Cox v. Dixie Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Peterson v. DonelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API