Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
The action was brought by the plaintiff upon a promissory note to recover from defendant $1,500 and interest.
Plaintiff issued an attachment which was levied upon certain property and moneys of defendant in the hands of the Los Angeles National Bank. Defendant made default, and no question was made as to plaintiff’s right to a judgment against defendant.
William Deering & Co. (a corporation) also brought an action against the same defendant (a corporation) to recover money due it from said defendant; issued a writ of attachment, which was subsequently levied upon the same property and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Gilman v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- City & County of San Francisco v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Moreland v. Monarch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
- Coffee v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.