Legal Opinion

James H. Washington Insurance Agency v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1993No. Nos. 62347, 62392PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Porter, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, James H. Washington Insurance Agency, appeals from the partial summary judgment (on five counts) and directed verdict (on four counts) in favor of defendant-appellee, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”), entered in the common pleas court below.

The issues in this case arise out of the interpretation of Washington’s exclusive Agent’s Agreement (“Agreement”) with Nationwide, effective January 1, 1987; Letters of Authority; and Nationwide’s Agent Brokerage Policy. Specifically, the appeal involves Nationwide’s right to cancel the Agreement any…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Brian Olander v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Woods Masonry, Inc. v. Monumental General Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
  5. Olander v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API