Legal Opinion
Deming v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 5, 2006No. SC 17459PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiffs in this joint appeal, Diane P. Deming, Robert H. Bardin and Edward J. McMahon, individually brought actions against the defendants, six companies affiliated with Nationwide Insurance Com pany (Nationwide), 1 alleging that the defendants wrongfully had withheld policy renewal commissions and deferred compensation, valued by the plaintiffs at more than $2 million collectively, 2 which were owed to them after the termination of their relationship as insurance agents for the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgments of the trial court rendering summary…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hamilton Insurance Services, Inc. v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Norton Sarnoff and Carl Fletcher, and v. American Home Products Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Sullivan v. ThorndikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Mystic Color Lab, Inc. v. Auctions Worldwide, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.