Legal Opinion
McQuown v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 6, 1972No. Cong. No. 2-70PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Review Panel :
By S. Res. 193 of the 91st Congress, 2d Sess., the United States Senate, on June 26, 1970, referred S. 1418, a bill for the relief of Carleton R. McQuown,1 to the Chief Commissioner of the United States Court of Claims, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1492 (1964) and 28 U.S.C. §2509 (Supp. IV, 1965-8).
The Chief Commissioner referred the matter to Commissioner David Schwartz for proceedings in accordance with the rules, and designated a three-member review panel to consider the trial commissioner’s report on the merits of claimant’s right to receive compensation for overtime work…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Mercier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Fox v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1976
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.