Legal Opinion
John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 23, 2004No. 18-2270PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) attorneys brought a class action lawsuit in the Court of Federal Claims seeking overtime compensation. The Federal Employees Pay Act (“FEPA”), 5 U.S.C. § 5542 (2000), provides for such compensation only when overtime has been “officially ordered or approved.” Id. § 5542(a). The relevant Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) regulation requires that overtime be officially “ordered or approved ... in writing.” 5 C.F.R. § 550.111(c) (2004). Because the overtime here was not officially ordered or approved in writing as required by the regulation,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Chao v. Gotham Registry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Bull v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Abbey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.