Legal Opinion
Bishop v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 7, 2006No. 03-446CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for unpaid overtime brought by various employees of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). Approximately 582 employees remain as plaintiffs in a number of related cases.2 Plaintiffs in these cases claim that the BOP violated the Federal Employee Pay Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 5542 (2000) (“FEPA”),3 by failing to compensate them for pre-shift and post-shift activities, including activities such as picking up equipment, walking to posts, briefing incoming replacements, checking in equipment, and attending meetings. Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spoerle v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Carlsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Carlsen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.