Ball v. California Conserving Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
Defendant appeals from a judgment recovered against it in an action instituted by F. M. Ball &' Co., a corporation, for commissions for negotiating three sales of what is commercially known as “tomato paste.” The complaint contained two counts covering each sale, one predicated upon the agreed compensation and the other upon the reasonable value of 'the services. The answer, by its failure to deny the same, admitted the allegations of the complaint touching the incorporation of the respective parties to the action, but denied the remaining allegations of each count. The…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- McGill v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- McAdoo v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Blaine v. StingerArizona Supreme Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.