Legal Opinion
Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 2007No. B190950PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Michael Faust (Faust) appeals a judgment following a grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, defendant and respondent California Portland Cement Company, a California corporation (Portland).
The gravamen of this action is Faust’s claim he was terminated in violation of his right to medical leave under California’s Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act (CFRA) (Gov. Code, § 12945.2), 1 a part of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (§ 12900 et seq.).
From the extensive papers on summary judgment, we glean a few key…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Nigro v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Nealy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.