Legal Opinion
Gallatin v. Markowitz
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1934No. Civ. No. 4909PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
Malvena Gallatin, the plaintiff and respondent herein, was the owner of a lot in the city of Sacramento, on which was situated an old brick building consisting of the ground floor and two or three upper stories. The entire building was leased to George Manóles until May 31, 1923, who had subleased to Ned Licht a store on the ground floor for a term also ending May 31, 1923. In February, 1921, the upper stories of the building were condemned by the city of Sacramento; that thereafter Mal-vena Gallatin demolished the entire building, forcing Licht to vacate about March 16, 1921, and thereafter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank of Redlands v. BowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Slama Tire Protector Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Brett v. Vanomar ProducersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Crowther v. Metalite Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Euless v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. Ganahl Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Scott v. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lewis Food Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.