First National Bank of Redlands v. Bowers
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. Frank F. Oster, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
LORIGAN, J.—
Plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant $12,529.92 upon a contract of guaranty executed by her in its favor.
The trial was had before a jury, and at the close of the evidence the court, over plaintiff’s objection, instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of defendant, which was done, and judgment entered thereon.
Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and from the order denying said motion and from the judgment it appeals.
The contract of guaranty upon which the action is brought is as follows:—
“Redlands, Cal., Dec. 1, 1897. “To the First…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bell v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Thompson v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. California Electric Works, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- O'Connor v. West Sacramento Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.