Legal Opinion

Euless v. Westphal

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1925No. Docket No. 5082PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff sued F. D. Vanderlip to recover a commission for the sale of real property situated in Fresno County and owned by said Vanderlip. Judgment went for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone. Since the appeal was taken the defendant died and E. M. Westphal, as executrix of his estate, has been duly' substituted in his stead.

The action was tried on plaintiff’s amended complaint and the answer thereto. The amended complaint was framed in two causes of action. The first was in the form of a common count and alleged that within one year last past the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Burton v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kennedy v. MerickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Curran v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loeb v. KimmerleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gallatin v. MarkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Heslin v. LaphamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Tracy-Waldron Fruit Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API