Slama Tire Protector Co. v. Ritchie
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. L. Short, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinioii of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment and the order denying it a new trial.
The controversy arises out of a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants, as copartners, at Kansas City, Missouri, on the eighth day of October, 1910. Said contract is made a part of the complaint.
The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Nebraska.'
The defendants, at the time of the making of the contract mentioned, were copartners, doing business in the city of Sacramento, under the firm name of Ritchie & Heriot.
The single question presented by this…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- McNeny v. TouchstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Whepley Oil Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.