Legal Opinion

Brett v. Vanomar Producers

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1919No. Civ. No. 3162PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leslie R. Hewitt, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

In this action plaintiff, assignee of the purchaser, sought damages for the alleged breach by the seller -of a contract for the sale of a crop of beans. Judgment was entered for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals, on the judgment-roll alone.

The reciprocal rights of the respective parties are to be determined by the construction to be placed on the contract contained in a letter written by the defendant corporation to the plaintiff’s assignor, A. G. Martin & Son, under date of February 23, 1916, the material parts of which (address and signature omitted) are as follows:

“This is to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re the Estate of ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Aguirre v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Weidenmueller v. Stearns Ranchos Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whepley Oil Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Edmonds v. PerryNevada Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Gallatin v. MarkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Western Industries Co. v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API