Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Ratinoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1983No. Civ. 68663PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCLOSKY, J.

Plaintiff Albert Cohen, doing business as Brentwood Carpet & Drapery, appeals from the judgment on the pleadings entered on July 8, 1982, wherein it was ordered that plaintiff take nothing on his complaint and that defendant Arthur S. Ratinoff recover his costs.

Contentions on Appeal

Plaintiff contends (1) that a motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings should be denied where the complaint does not entirely omit an essential allegation to the statement of a cause of action and it does not appear from the face of the complaint or from judicially noticed matter that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Nicholson v. United Pacific InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Sklar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API