Legal Opinion
Kachig v. Boothe
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1971No. Civ. 11502PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
At the commencement of trial, defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings were granted and judgment for defendants was entered. Plaintiffs (the Kachigs) appeal.
Facts
When a motion for judgment on the pleadings has the purpose and effect of a general demurrer, the facts alleged in the pleading attacked must be accepted as true, and the court may also consider matters subject to judicial notice. (Colberg, Inc. v. State of California ex rel. Dept. Pub. Wks., 67 Cal.2d 408, 412 [62 Cal.Rptr. 401, 432 P.2d 3]; MacIsaac v. Pozzo, 26 Cal.2d 809, 813 [161 P.2d 449]; see 4…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.