Legal Opinion
Sklar v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1986No. A032762PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
185 Cal.App.3d 616 (1986)
230 Cal. Rptr. 42
RICHARD SKLAR et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. A032762.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.
September 17, 1986.
COUNSEL
Robert L. Gnaizda, Sidney M. Wolinsky and James R. Wheaton for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and Julian O. Standen, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
SABRAW, J.
Today we consider whether taxpayers can obtain mandamus to compel the State Franchise Tax Board (Board) to adopt certain specific…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Mullen v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- City of Palo Alto v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- Imperial Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Tomaselli v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.