Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1985No. S.F. 24851PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

This case concerns the effect of a provision in a commercial lease1 that the lessee may not assign the lease or sublet the premises without the lessor’s prior written consent, The question we address is whether, in the absence of a provision that such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, a lessor may unreasonably and arbitrarily withhold his or her consent to an assignment.2 This is a question of first impression in this court.

*493I.

This case arises on appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend.3 We review the allegations of the complaint applying…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API