Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD, J.
This case concerns the effect of a provision in a commercial lease1 that the lessee may not assign the lease or sublet the premises without the lessor’s prior written consent, The question we address is whether, in the absence of a provision that such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, a lessor may unreasonably and arbitrarily withhold his or her consent to an assignment.2 This is a question of first impression in this court.
*493I.
This case arises on appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend.3 We review the allegations of the complaint applying…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.