Legal Opinion

McCulloch v. Jeakins

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1983No. 14379PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of $5,889.42 against appellants. On October 27, 1982, appellants filed a motion in district court to stay execution of the money judgment pending their appeal to this court. Appellants requested that “no supersedeas bond be required for this stay based upon [their] uncontested record of payment of their just debts.” On the following day, the district court granted appellants’ motion, staying execution of the judgment without the posting of a supersedeas bond. Respondent was not given an opportunity to oppose appellants’ motion in district court.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poplar Grove Planting and Refining Co., Inc. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Segal v. SegalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Muck v. Arapahoe County District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Murray Vs. A Cab Taxi Serv. LlcNevada Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API