Legal Opinion
Segal v. Segal
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2001No. AC 19485PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
This is the plaintiffs appeal and the defendant’s cross appeal from a supplemental judgment in a partition action between a former husband and wife who were divorced by virtue of a Nevada state court decree. Their Connecticut property, which they owned jointly with rights of survivorship,1 was sold at a partition sale, and the issue before us involves the division of the sale proceeds. We affirm the judgment of the trial court on the appeal and on the cross appeal.
The plaintiff (former husband) claims that the court improperly (1) presumed that in the first instance the *19net…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Vesce v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Krueger v. KruegerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Segal v. SegalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Segal v. SegalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Segal v. SegalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Segal v. SegalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001