Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1995No. 1995-0391PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 194.] THE STATE EX REL. LIPOSCHAK v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO. [Cite as State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.,
1995-Ohio-138.] Workers' compensation—Application for permanent total disability compensation—Claimant diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma twelve years after resigning in lieu of disciplinary action—Industrial Commission errs in denying compensation when claimant suffers from a condition with an extremely long latency period. (No. 95-391—Submitted April 24, 1995—Decided August 16, 1995.) IN MANDAMUS.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. CPC Group v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Jacobs v. Teledyne, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Consolidated Biscuit v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-47 (5-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State ex rel. Reliance Elec. Co. v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Vansuch v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.