Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Teledyne, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1988No. 87-1297PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The primary issue presented in this action is whether appellant’s 1984 claim for workers’ compensation benefits was properly rejected. We hold in the negative and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

As noted above, the court of appeals held that appellant’s 1984 claim was barred under the doctrine of res judicata. Both appellees echo this argument in their briefs. This court has applied the doctrine of res judicata to those administrative proceedings which are “ ‘of a judicial nature and where the parties have had an ample opportunity to litigate the issues involved in the proceeding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re Ohio Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lupo v. VoinovichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
  4. Cleveland v. S.W. Invests., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Gerstenberger v. City of MacEdoniaOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API