Legal Opinion
Argus Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 27, 1982No. 79 Civ. 4525PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GAGLIARDI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Argus Incorporated, Interphoto Corporation, and Sugra Northeast, Incorporated (collectively referred to hereinafter as “Argus”) 1 commenced this action for monetary and injunctive relief against Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”), GTE Sylvania Incorporated (“Sylvania”), General Electric Company (“G.E.”), and several individual officers, directors and employees of Kodak, Sylvania and G.E. 2 Plaintiffs seek treble damages and injunctive relief under sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26, for alleged violations of sections 1 and 2…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Gary D. Gillihan v. Duane Shillinger Tom Shanyfelt and John BunchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa NostraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Electronics Relays (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. PascenteDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.