Legal Opinion
Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 8, 1986No. 670, Docket 85-7549PublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge.
This action involves a claim based on the conduct of defendant Eastman Kodak Corporation (“Kodak”) held to be an antitrust violation in Berkey Photo Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 301-04 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1093, 100 S.Ct. 1061, 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980). It was brought by Argus Incorporated (“Argus”), a licensor of the trademark “Argus” for use on camera equipment, and Interphoto Corporation (“Interphoto”), a wholesale distributor of cameras and camera equipment controlled by Argus. They seek monetary damages under the Clayton and Sherman Acts,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Coleman Vital v. Interfaith Medical Center and Local 1199Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.