Legal Opinion

Nowlin v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 18, 1990No. 1 CA-IC 89-114PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

This special action review of an Industrial Commission award requires an analysis of the risks associated with the employment necessary to satisfy the “arising out of employment” requirement of A.R.S. § 23-1021.

Procedural History

Petitioner employee (claimant) worked for respondent employer (Personnel Pool), a temporary employment agency. In December 1988, Personnel Pool placed claimant as a temporary receptionist for a business client. On December 29, 1988, claimant’s third or fourth day on the job, she took a regular afternoon break and then returned to her desk to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. SE Rykoff & Co. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Noble v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Dependable Messenger, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API