Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
Respondent Laws was employed by the petitioner as a guard at one of its warehouses in Phoenix. His hours of employment were from 3 p. m. to 11 p. m., with no time off for lunch. His instructions were to bring his lunch and eat it on the premises. He was credited with 8% hours per day, the additional half hour being allowed which would ordinarily have been consumed if he had eaten off the premises. He had been in the employ of the petitioner for nine months.
On August 24, 1944, Laws drove to the warehouse shortly before 3 o ’clock. He left his lunch, including a bottle of Royal Crown Cola, on…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Bradshaw v. AronovitchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.