Legal Opinion

Noble v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 12, 1996No. 1 CA-IC 95-0166PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is a review of an award and decision upon review denying compensability. Applying our independent judgment, we conclude that an injury arises out of and in the course of employment when a worker voluntarily but reasonably uses his or her employer’s premises after-hours and the origin of the risk resulting in the injury is the employer’s business use of the premises. We accordingly set aside the award and decision upon review.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Respondent employer (ABCO) employed petitioner employee (claimant) in a Phoenix area grocery store. The store…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Carter v. Volunteer Apparel, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Briley v. Farm Fresh, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  5. Finnegan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Bergmann Precision, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Cardenas v. amavizca/special FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Gaines v. DC DOES and WAMATADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Ibarra v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API