Noble v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
This is a review of an award and decision upon review denying compensability. Applying our independent judgment, we conclude that an injury arises out of and in the course of employment when a worker voluntarily but reasonably uses his or her employer’s premises after-hours and the origin of the risk resulting in the injury is the employer’s business use of the premises. We accordingly set aside the award and decision upon review.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Respondent employer (ABCO) employed petitioner employee (claimant) in a Phoenix area grocery store. The store…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Carter v. Volunteer Apparel, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Briley v. Farm Fresh, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Finnegan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaines v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Bergmann Precision, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Cardenas v. amavizca/special FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Gaines v. DC DOES and WAMATADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Ibarra v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.