Legal Opinion

Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1990No. CV-89-0415-PRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Claimant employee, Pauline L. Shoemaker, petitioned this court to review a decision of the Arizona Court of Appeals that set aside her award for worker’s compensation benefits. 162 Ariz. 560, 785 P.2d 80. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. §§ 12-120.24, 23-948 and Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S.

II. ISSUE

Did claimant’s injuries arise out of her employment within the meaning of A.R.S. § 23-1021(A)?

III. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On 14 January 1988, Pauline L. Shoemaker (claimant), an employee of Circle K Store #…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Milledge v. OaksIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. PYA/Monarch and Reliance Ins. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  3. Logsdon v. ISCO CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. City of Brighton v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API