Legal Opinion

Vetter v. Security Continental Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1997No. C6-96-843PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

In this matter we are asked to consider whether a novation occurred releasing the original Illinois-based insurance company ob-ligor from the terms of annuity contracts held by a Minnesota trustee. The trial court held that there was no material fact “remotely suggesting that the Plaintiffs intended to release the original insurance company * * *” under the standards of novation applied in either Minnesota or Illinois, and granted summary judgment to the claimants against the original insurance company obli-gor. Approximately $2 million in damages and costs was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. General Mills, Inc. v. Gold Medal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Hedglin v. City of WillmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. S O Designs USA, Inc. v. Rollerblade, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API