Legal Opinion
Hedglin v. City of Willmar
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1998No. C1-97-520PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
In June 1995, respondents, former Will-mar, Minnesota firefighters Joseph Hedglin, Bradley Lundquist, and Robert Grove commenced an action against appellants, former Willmar Fire Chief Douglas Lindblad and the City of Willmar, under the whistleblower statute, Minn.Stat. § 181.932 (1996). The complaint alleged that Lindblad and the city had violated the statute by retaliating against Hedglin, Lundquist, and Grove after they had reported misconduct at the fire department to city officials. The Kandiyohi County District Court granted summary judgment to Lindblad…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Vetter v. Security Continental Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Obst v. Microtron, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Cokley v. City of OtsegoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Freeman v. Ace Telephone Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.