Legal Opinion
Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & Hannan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 31, 1992No. C1-92-76PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises directly from a summary judgment granted by the Hennepin County District Court to defendant law firms, O’Connor & Hannan (O & H) and Kirkland & Ellis (K & E), in a legal malpractice action brought by Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. (Admiral Merchants) and Leamington Co. (Leamington).
We believe there are material facts in dispute as to whether or not 0 & H’s and/or K & E’s failure to request arbitration in Admiral Merchants’ pension dispute with the Teamsters Central States, Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Fund (Central States Fund), was legal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Rouse v. Dunkley & Bennett, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Lassen v. First Bank Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.