Legal Opinion

Kowalsky v. Leonard

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 6, 1936No. File #54142PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

This demurrer raises the question as to whether a father may recover from a tort-feasor for the loss of the services of his minor son resulting from the wrongful death of that son.

It is fundamental that, at common law no cause of action would lie in favor of anyone for wrongful death and this rule has been almost universally applied so as to deny to surviving husbands the right to recover for loss of consortium resulting from wrongful death of their wives and to surviving parents of children killed by the wrongful act the right to recover for loss of services after the death.

Schouler,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  2. Shiels v. AudetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Broughel v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. Grosso v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  5. Callaghan v. Lake Hopatcong Ice Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucier v. HittlemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Leland v. ChawlaConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
  3. Binkiski v. City of New HavenConnecticut Superior Court · 1943
  4. Binkiski v. City of New HavenConnecticut Superior Court · 1943
  5. Larose v. RosenblattConnecticut Superior Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API