Legal Opinion

Larose v. Rosenblatt

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 21, 1946No. File No.77518Published

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

The first three counts of the complaint in -this action allege causes of action in favor of the named plaintiff for the wrongful death of a child, Albert LaRose, Jr. The fourth count purports to set up a cause of action on behalf of the other plaintiff, Albert LaRose, who was the father of the decedent, to recover hospital and medical expenses incurred by him as a result of the injuries sustained by the decedent by reason of the defendant’s alleged torts. The demurrer is on the ground that no such cause of action exists.

It has been definitely decided in this state that a father is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shiels v. AudetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Lucier v. HittlemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Kowalsky v. LeonardConnecticut Superior Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API