Legal Opinion

Callaghan v. Lake Hopatcong Ice Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pitney, J.

This is an action of tort, and in the declaration the plaintiff is described as “Philip- G-. Callaghan, the father of William H. Callaghan, a minor, deceased.” There is no averment that the plaintiff has letters -of administration upon the estate of 'his son. The declaration sets forth that the defendant employed the said William H. Callaghan to ■work in and about a certain ice-house, and the structures connected therewith, for hire paid by the defendant to the said William H. Callaghan, and that, by reason of the negligence of the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Traction Co. v. HoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Higgins v. SchneiderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Brennan v. BiberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Kowalsky v. LeonardConnecticut Superior Court · 1936
  5. Ferguson v. Delaware & Atlantic Telegraph & Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API