Legal Opinion

Binkiski v. City of New Haven

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 26, 1943No. File No. 63323Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of decision on demurrer.

QUINLAN, J.

Counsel argued this demurrer on the assumption a preliminary statement of demurrer was incorporated in the demurrer.

The questions presented by this demurrer arise under section 1430e of the 1939 Supplement to the General Statutes. It concerns an action claiming damages in excess of the $15,000 limit provided by statute, and alleging loss of earnings and services of a minor boy. The question has been so frequently and so well discussed as not to require a lengthy memorandum. See Kowalsky vs. Leonard, 4 Conn. Sup. 219 (Inglis, J.); Lucier vs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kling v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  2. Lucier v. HittlemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Perlstein v. Westport Sanitarium Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1942
  4. Kowalsky v. LeonardConnecticut Superior Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API