Binkiski v. City of New Haven
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Counsel argued this demurrer on the assumption a preliminary statement of demurrer was incorporated in the demurrer.
The questions presented by this demurrer arise under section 1430e of the 1939 Supplement to the General Statutes. It concerns an action claiming damages in excess of the $15,000 limit provided by statute, and alleging loss of earnings and services of a minor boy. The question has been so frequently and so well discussed as not to require a lengthy memorandum.See Kowalsky vs. Leonard, 4 Conn. Sup. 219 (Inglis, J.);Lucier vs. Hittleman, 125 Conn. 635, 638, and Perlstein…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kling v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Lucier v. HittlemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Perlstein v. Westport Sanitarium Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1942
- Kowalsky v. LeonardConnecticut Superior Court · 1936