Legal Opinion

Louis & Diederich, Inc. v. Cambridge European Imports, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1987No. H000950PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

—As a provisional remedy in the course of his lawsuit against a car dealer (Cambridge European Imports, Inc.) for nondelivery of a new Ferrari which had been paid for in full, plaintiff Louis & Diederich, Inc. (Louis) obtained an order giving him the right to attach a Mercedes-Benz on the dealer’s showroom floor. This order provided that the dealer continue to offer the Mercedes for sale to the public and pay Louis the proceeds from any sale. In compliance with the order, the dealer turned over to Louis the pink slip on the Mercedes. Unbeknownst to Louis, however, the dealer…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Ferraro v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Oregel v. AMERICAN ISUZU MOTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Suburban Motors, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Hellman v. La Cumbre Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API