Legal Opinion
Hellman v. La Cumbre Golf & Country Club
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 26, 1992No. B055857PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
Anita Hellman and M. Stanley Goldberg appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent La Cumbre Golf and Country Club against appellants on their cause of action for damages and injunction for nuisance. They contend: (1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding that the rate of golf balls landing on their property has been the same since 1957; (2) failure to issue a proper statement of decision is reversible error per se; (3) the doctrine of coming to a nuisance is no longer viable; (4) the statute of limitations is inapplicable to a continuing nuisance;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Nunes Turfgrass, Inc. v. Vaughan-Jacklin Seed Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- In Re Marriage of Garrity and BishtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Muzquiz v. City of EmeryvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Peak-Las Positas Partners v. BollagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ribakoff v. City of Long Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sperber v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.