Legal Opinion

Suburban Motors, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1990No. C004432PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA. P. J.

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from a summary judgment declaring plaintiff, Suburban Motors, Inc., has valid title to an automobile. State Farm contends its title, obtained directly from the lawful owner whom it insured and from whom the vehicle was stolen, is superior to the claim of Suburban Motors, a bona fide purchaser for value under a “chain of title” traceable to the thief. We agree and shall reverse the judgment.

The summary judgment motion was submitted to the trial court on stipulated facts. Richard Kirschner was the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. GallOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. English v. Ralph Williams FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Cox Cable San Diego, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. T & O Mobile Homes, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re CohenUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Allstate Insurance v. LooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Nathan A. Watson Co. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Naftzger v. American Numismatic SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API