Legal Opinion
Marshall & Co. v. Weisel
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1966No. Civ. 22683PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Defendants Weisel, Lipschutz and Gold appeal from a judgment of $13,000 entered against them in favor of plaintiff, a corporation, following a nonjury trial. On appeal Gold has abandoned any separate defenses, taking the position that if the judgment is valid as against his codefendants it may be deemed to be good as against him.
Respondent is a licensed real estate broker and as such negotiates loans on real estate for a fee. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 10131.) Detweiler is one of its officers.
In the first part of August 1962, Weisel and Lipschutz, co-partners doing business as “Fontainbleu,” were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bohman v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Williams v. KinseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Warshauer v. Bauer Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Stark v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Pryor v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- United States ex rel. Oliver v. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- U.S. ex rel. Oliver v. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- City of Stockton v. Stockton Plaza Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.