United States ex rel. Oliver v. Parsons Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The opinion filed July 19,1999, is hereby amended as follows:
At slip opinion 8102, at the end of the sentence that begins, “Their meaning is ultimately the subject of judicial interpretation,” add the following as footnote 2:
We note that the agency to which the allegedly false claim was submitted has not taken any position regarding any of the issues in this case, and thus no question of Chevron deference is presented.
At slip opinion page 8103, add the following section at the end of section III. A. 3. as subsection 4:
4
In a petition for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Chen-Cheng Wang, AKA C.C. Wang, an Individual and Ex Rel. The United States of America v. Fmc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Kareem Abdul-Jabbar v. General Motors Corporation Leo Burnett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States Ex Rel. Allen Lamers v. City of Green BayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Kitsap Physicians ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Shaw v. AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Minnesota Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. Allina Health System Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.