Legal Opinion
Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 10, 1986No. B012889PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Defendants and appellants Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated (DBL) and Robert B. Zusman (Zusman) appeal from the denial of their petition to compel arbitration and motion for an order staying proceedings pending arbitration of their controversy with plaintiff and respondent Adora K. Chan (Chan).
Because the arbitration clause was not incorporated by reference into Chan’s application form, the order is affirmed.
Factual and Procedural Background
Chan was employed as a stockbroker by DBL, a securities brokerage firm, of which Zusman is an executive. As a condition of her…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- South Bay Chevrolet v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.