Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gas v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 2012No. A127554PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRUINIERS, J.

For over 80 years, the City and County of San Francisco (City) has generated electric power at its Hetch Hetchy hydroelectric project in the Sierra Nevada. The City’s power transmission lines, however, reach only to the City of Newark. Pursuant to contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) transmits City-generated electricity the remaining distance to San Francisco and distributes it locally. The contract distinguishes electricity to be used for municipal purposes (Municipal Load) and electricity to be used for commercial purposes, for which PG&E generally has the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Charles Starbuck v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Conejo Wellness Center, Inc. v. City of Agoura HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Utility Reform Network v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. W.R. (In re W.R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. W.R. (In re W.R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API