Utility Reform Network v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
In 2012, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) filed an application with the California Public Utilities Commission (the Commission) seeking approval of an agreement by which PG&E would acquire a new gas-fired powerplant in Oakley, California (the Oakley Project). A principal issue in the application proceedings was whether there was a need for the Oakley Project. The need was said to arise in part from California’s efforts to obtain a greater percentage of its energy from renewable sources, thus requiring additional conventional electrical generating capacity to cope…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. W.R. (In re W.R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Pablo Bay Pipeline Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. W.R. (In re W.R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Branch Banking & Trust v. PUC CA5California Court of Appeal · 2014
- City and County of S.F. v. Public Utilities Com.California Court of Appeal · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.