Legal Opinion

United States v. City & County of San Francisco

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 1940No. 587PublishedCited by 351 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

By the Raker Act of December 19, 1913, Congress granted the City and County of San Francisco, 2 subject to express conditions, certain lands and rights-of-way in the public domain in Yosemite National Park and Stanis-laus National Forest. The Act in terms declared that this, known as the “Hetch-Hetchy” grant, was intended for use by the City both in constructing and maintaining *a means of supplying water for the ■'domestic purposes of the City and other public bodies, and in establishing a system “for generation and sale and distribution of electric energy.”

Upon application of the Secretary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by351 opinions

  1. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

346 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API