Legal Opinion
Charles Starbuck v. City and County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1977No. 75-2213PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
The present appeal gives renewed vitality to the long-time dispute over the delivery of hydroelectric power from the Hetch Hetchy Valley to the Bay Area. Appellants, residents, taxpayers, and consumers of electricity in San Francisco, allege that San Francisco’s present “wheeling” arrangement with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company violates Section 6 of the Raker Act of December 19, 1913, ch. 4, 38 Stat. 242, establishing the Hetch Hetchy Valley as a resource of water and electric power. Appellees are the City and County of San Francisco [“San Francisco”], Pacific…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Doe/70 v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- City of Santa Clara v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. SineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Threadgill v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Peugeot v. United States Trustee (In Re Crayton)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.